Posts Tagged ‘Hiring’

Do We Really Need Recruitment Agencies?

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

What benefits do recruitment agencies provide? With the advent of online job-sites can’t you do the job yourself and save a fortune on agency commissions.

In today’s BTalk Australia Phil Dobbie talks to Kelly Magowan, co-founder of Sixbnet Figures, the Premium Job Site for $100K+ Jobs.  She says agencies still have a role to play although the shortfalls often relate to the relationship between the agency and the recruiter. Phil suggests a better way of structuring the way agencies and clients work together.

To listen to this podcast and have your say visit BTalk Australia

Sydney HR & Recruitment Professionals – Passionate & Switched On

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

I don’t want to turn this into a Melbourne Sydney thing (as I am from Melbourne) however I have to say when I go up to Sydney to meet with clients in Recruitment and HR Professionals in businesses and agencies I am always blown away by how switched on and passionate they are. I always learn new things and feel that they keep up to speed with what is going on in the HR and Recruitment industry which I just love. I feel so energized and re-charged after my client visits in Sydney and wonder why I don’t seem to get this same buzz from Melbourne. Granted there are some terrific recruitment and HR professionals in Melbourne. However perhaps we sometimes take things a bit slower, are less inclined to try new things until it has been proven before, we prefer to play it safe, are reserved and like do business with people we know. It could also be that Sydney is more of a globally playing field and so need to move quicker and be on top of things whilst we remain a little isolated here.

I am heading up to Sydney again in another week to meet current and prospective clients and truly look forward to going there as I know even if I don’t come back with new business I will have learned some invaluable new things. 

There is a lot of competition for the best talent sourcing channels

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

As a job board start up, www.sixfigures.com.au conversations and competition around what is the best talent sourcing channel always hold a great deal of interest to me. Are large generalist sites better than niche sites? Is print media better than job boards? Do employee referral programs really deliver the best results? Should businesses not use any online job sites and have their own careers sites and some landing pages? What I find interesting is that these conversations in the media are generated and dominated by the three large media giants, who own the major job sites and most of the print media!

I would suggest that all of the above sourcing channels are valuable and should be utilised accordingly dependent on the type of role you are recruiting for. There is not one golden goose that will continually deliver the golden egg. Rather like any form of marketing a strategic approach needs to be engaged for each job you are seeking to fill to actually connect with your target market. Whilst some organisations (particularly government and education) seem to think that all job ads for all levels still need to be in print media, others are aware of the fact that the majority of people of all ages now search online.


A post on Jobadder around ‘Is there room for more job boards in Australia’

http://jobadder.com/Blog/2008/05/20/Is-there-room-for-more-job-boards-in-Australia.aspx#comments shows some interesting views on the subject.


There is however always room for new players in every market, including the job board market in which there is a lot of room to innovative, around technology, process, service, design and so on.


As we know most job sites are volume and transaction driven which suits some professions, whilst not others. The focus is not on the quality of information being circulated but rather the numbers! The market is starting to fragment with niche sites emerging and proving to be successful, even more successful than generalist sites in some instances. The trend of niche will no doubt continue, as Australia follows the success of overseas markets.

businesscards

In a recent presentation by Rob McGovern, founder of Career Builder and more recently Job Fox, Career Builder, a rival to Monster in the USA has about a 5% placement rate. On average these generalist sites deliver around 4-5 applicants per job ad. I am not sure of the figures in Australia for the larger sites, though something I would be keen to know.


Markets change so quickly these days, technology and innovation is rapid and businesses need to look at and commit to new initiatives to stay ahead of the game. I don’t think too many businesses can afford to not be open to change and new sourcing channels, particularly in the talent attraction and retention space.

Why We Need To Shift Our Hiring Mentality

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

scalesReading Seth’s Blog awhile back http://sethgodin.typepad.com/ it really struck a cord with me, around how we are still hiring based on how people use to work, though I don’t think this necessary relates only to fast growing organizations. In the past we have a lot of manual based roles that required people to be task focused, with following set instructions being crucial to the outcome.

In this day and age, with over half the population in Australia considered ‘knowledge workers’ who are operating in a world of constant change and often ambiguity, the people who can follow instructions are still required however are increasingly becoming the minority. Why then do we always want to hire someone who has done the job before and who can demonstrate an ability to follow instructions clearly. I am still unsure, I expect because it seems easier and safer than acknowledging times have changed and adjusting accordingly.

With the combination of ‘knowledge workers’ and more project related roles, the ability to follow loose instructions, collaborate on ideas and approaches to create a flexible framework to achieve an outcome/s is no doubt increasingly important, and will continue to be so in the future. I am sure if we allowed it to, it would also bring a little more challenge and interest into many organizations and to people’s jobs.

That is where I think Generation Y and those with a similar work approach have the advantage. They are flexible, great at collaborating (in the real world and virtually) and are really open to new ways of achieving outcomes. I like their confidence and spirit and willingness to experiment. They are not afraid if they don’t have all the answers up front and are happy to learn as they go. Generation Y are also not pre-conditioned to how it use to be done.

From Seth’s Blog by Seth Godin, 21 June 2007

Most fast-growing organizations are looking for people who can get stuff done.

There is a fundamental shift in rules from manual-based work (where you follow instructions and an increase in productivity means doing the steps faster) to project-based work (where the instructions are unknown, and visualizing outcomes and then getting things done is what counts.)

And yet, we’re still trying to hire people who have shown an ability to follow instructions.

Hiring For the Future

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

The traditional hiring and management practices of the past are increasingly irrelevant in today’s market and we are already starting to see a shift with Generation Y. Businesses that are strategic and have a proactive and future focus towards their human capital will be the most sought after places to work by the best people.


Australia is fortunate enough to have a culturally diverse, skilled and educated workforce, with 2001 ABS statistics showing 38% as degree qualified. We are a prosperous country that supposedly values the phrase of ‘have a go’. For many businesses though this does not seem to translate so well into the workforce, with a fear and reluctance by many businesses of hiring staff who have not already done the same or very similar job to the position they are seeking to fill. With businesses now not having the luxury of choice between many applicants for their positions, they would no doubt find themselves more successful in filling their vacancies if they followed this attitude of allowing people to ‘have a go’, though obviously within reason and within certain parameters / guidelines defined by the business.


Often when recruiting we overlook the fact that for the majority of positions, there is a thread of common skills that weave through them all including communication and interpersonal skills, coordination, time management, flexibility, attention to detail, team work, problem solving and so on. On top of these skills sit more specific skills that may require certain educational qualifications or on the job experience and training. Some of which are essential to the position from day one, others of which can be learned within a reasonable timeframe and are not essential to the position initially.


I can empathize with Recruitment Consultants, as clients are not always willing to look outside the square at applicants who are not a direct match to what they perceive is essential to the position. However it I believe Recruitment Consultants need to take responsibility for the education of their clients in looking more broadly at their applicant’s transferable skills.


For example someone who has worked in the hospitality industry at a five star hotel or restaurant will have terrific relationship building and communication skills, they tend to gain energy from interacting with people, building lasting relationships, listening to and helping meet their customers needs. If you then look at an Account Manager in any industry, these are very similar skills and attributes to what makes a successful Account Manager. Very rarely however will you find someone from the business sector hiring an Account Manager from a hospitality background due to their inability to see the transferable skills from the two positions.


Likewise you can look at the example of Teachers; they generally are organized, have great written and verbal communication skills, like to share information and knowledge with others, enjoy learning, work well in teams and autonomously, and are good at following rules and guidelines. The occupations that they can transfer into readily include Human Resources, Training,

Administration, Researching, and many more.

womenatwork

The key is for those hiring to be able to take multiple factors into consideration and look beyond what positions the applicant has done in the past. What is more important is what they are seeking to do in the future. The hiring manager needs to be able to assess the applicant’s skills and real desire to move into another position, which may differ from what they have done in the past. This can be done through many avenues including probing questions as to why they are applying for the position, do they have any education or volunteer work to support their desire and commitment to transitioning into a new position type, are they willing to take a salary cut, undergo further training or education of their own free will and so on. Often these people who have the enthusiasm and commitment to taking on a new position can prove to be more successful than someone who has done the same position for many years and perhaps has lost their edge and motivation and are really just going through the motions.


What we really need is a paradigm shift away from the traditional recruiting practices of ages gone by. We are living in a new age, the information age, the technology age which has forced business and employees to approach employment with a new perspective - it is exciting and should be embraced. We should be hiring on skills, attitude, flexibility, team work, future performance, creativity and other such attributes. We should be hiring for the future, not on the past, which is what current and traditional recruitment and staff management practices rely on.